The Faith part 4
The
Trinity Test
by
Greg Hanson
Sunrise Wesleyan Church
February 1, 2009
Did
anyone not get a copy of the Sunrise Update this morning? Over the past
few weeks, we’ve been working our way through this message series
called The Faith. This is now our fourth week into it, and we’ve been
talking about a lot of the foundational beliefs that have united all
Christ-followers in all places at all times.
Today we’re going
to be talking about The Trinity. This one of the most basic and at the
same time most misunderstood beliefs of the Christian faith. So what I
thought I’d do is start by just giving you a little test. In your
Sunrise Update, you’ll see your message notes are a little bit
different than usual. Instead of the usual fill in the blank kind of
outline that I typically give you with all the Bible verses included,
what I’ve done this time is given you The Trinity Test. So I’m going to
give you four or five minutes right now to just take a look through
these multiple choice questions and choose the statements that you
think are true, and then we’ll go through them one at a time and we’ll
see how you do. And when we do that, you can use the space in between
to take notes. Okay?
PLAY SONG
Creed by Rich Mullins
********************
The
Trinity Test:
Which of
these statements is true?
A. The early Christian creeds teach the
doctrine of the Trinity
B. The doctrine of the Trinity originated
at the Council of Nicaea in A.D. 325
C. The doctrine of the Trinity is rooted
in Scripture
D. Both A and C
A. Jesus claimed to be God
B. The disciples believed Jesus to be
God, though Jesus never claimed to be God himself
C. The Roman emperor Constantine declared
Jesus to be divine
D. Both B and C
A. Jesus was God taking on the appearance
of a human
B. Jesus was God born as a human
C. Jesus was a mortal man that the Spirit
of God entered at his baptism
D. None of the above
A. God the Father became Jesus and then
became the Holy Spirit
B. God the Father, Jesus, and the Holy
Spirit are three separate persons
C.
Before the incarnation, only God the Father existed. Then the Son
(Jesus) was born, and then the Holy Spirit was sent at Pentecost.
D. All of the above
A. The word Trinity is found in the Bible
B. The doctrine of the Trinity is a
contradiction and must be accepted by faith
C. The Trinity is a mystery that goes
beyond our understanding
D. None of the above
A. God is the total life-force of all
living things.
B. God is a person
C. The Trinity teaches that there are
three gods
D. None of the above
A. Jesus was the first creation of God
the Father
B. Jesus appeared in the Old Testament as
the archangel Michael
C. Jesus was fully God and fully man
D. Both A and C
A. The Father is the greatest member of
the Trinity
B. The Son is the greatest member of the
Trinity
C. The Holy Spirit is the greatest member
of the Trinity
D. None of the above
********************
This
doctrine of the Trinity is core to the core of the Christian faith. It
summarizes our understanding of the nature of God and helps us
understand who He is, and that’s important because it affects how we
relate to Him and whether we can really know Him or not. Plus, if you
get this all messed up, or if you reject it altogether, you can end up
worshipping a false god, and I know you don’t want to do that. So this
is important.
Now, this doctrine of the Trinity that we hold as
Christians stands in stark contrast to other religions such as Judaism
and Islam, where God is seen not as Trinitarian but as Unitarian… that
is, one person. In Christianity, God is understood to be three persons.
This is also a major point of distinction between Christianity and
pseudo-Christian cults, like Jehovah’s Witnesses, Mormons,
Scientologists… These pseudo-Christian cults… I believe without
exception… deny this doctrine of the Trinity in some way, shape or form.
So
the Trinity is kind of a plumb-line for the orthodox Christian view of
God. But unfortunately, if you ask most Christians they can’t really
explain it or defend it themselves. This is a core belief of the
Christian faith, but Christians are not equipped to understand it let
alone tell others about it. And if you do ask a believer to explain the
Trinity, they might make a valiant attempt but often they’ll end up on
some pretty shaky ground. They may even start proclaiming a heresy,
which is a belief that is false and has been condemned by the Christian
church.
Now, as we go through this today, this is going to be a
little bit more academic than usual. And we’re going to talk some about
history, because to better understand the Trinity, we need to
understand how this doctrine developed.
Okay? So let’s get going. In question 1, you were asked to choose the
correct statement from these four…
Question
1.
A. The early Christian creeds teach the
doctrine of the Trinity
B. The doctrine of the Trinity originated
at the Council of Nicaea in AD 325
C. The doctrine of the Trinity is rooted
in Scripture
D.
Both A and C
It’s
true that at the Council of Nicaea this doctrine was examined and was
debated and was eventually expressed in the Nicene Creed. But that’s
not where the idea of the Trinity originated. It was already being
taught long before then. In fact, you see the concept of the Trinity
being taught in Scripture itself.
The Bible
teaches that…
The Father is
God
Like in 1 Peter 1:2 where it says…
1 Peter 1:2 (NLT)
God the Father knew you and chose you long ago…
The Son
(Jesus) is God
Philippians 2:5-6 (NLT)
You
must have the same attitude that Christ Jesus had. Though he was God,
he did not think of equality with God as something to cling to.
The Holy
Spirit is God
Acts 5:3-4 (NLT)
Then
Peter said, “Ananias, why have you let Satan fill your heart? You lied
to the Holy Spirit, and you kept some of the money for yourself… You
weren’t lying to us but to God!”
There is only
One God
Isaiah 45:22 (NLT)
“Let all the world look to me for salvation! For I am God; there is no
other.”
The
Father is God, Jesus is God, and the Holy Spirit is God. And the Father
is not Jesus or the Holy Spirit, Jesus is not the Holy Spirit or the
Father, and the Holy Spirit is not the Father or Jesus. But there is
only one God. But how can that be? Isn’t that contradictory? Well,
we’ll get to that. Right now what I want you to understand is that
isn’t something that was invented several centuries after the time of
Jesus; it can be traced right to Scripture itself.
Question
2.
A.
Jesus claimed to be God
B. The disciples believed Jesus to be
God, though Jesus never claimed to be God himself
C. The Roman emperor Constantine declared
Jesus to be divine
D. Both B and C
I
expect some of you may have watched that miniseries that was on last
weekend… The Last Templar. Or maybe you even read the book. Well,
according to The Last Templar, Jesus may have written in a diary or in
His own Gospel that he was a man and just a man, not God.
Now, I
don’t mind when people raise honest objections to Christianity because
I believe there are answers, but I’m not much of a fan of this current
trend to create false evidence and distort history. I realize that The
Last Templar was meant to be a work of fiction, but I also realize that
when The DaVinci Code came out, one third of the Canadians who read it
believed its claims to be true. So for anyone who might be prone to
think fiction is fact, I want to set the record straight.
No,
there is no secret Gospel in which Jesus claimed to be only a man and
not divine. And no, the divinity of Jesus was not created by the
emperor Constantine. That’s a popular claim these days, that
Constantine orchestrated the Council of Nicaea in order to declare that
Jesus was God, even though before that time Jesus was considered to be
just a man. But the truth is, Jesus was considered to be divine long
before that. At the Council of Nicaea it was never even a question
whether or not Jesus was divine… everyone already believed He was. What
they wanted to figure out was, just what kind of a God is He? But the
claim that Jesus was God can be found in the words of Jesus Himself.
Jesus claimed to be God, and His followers understood Him to be divine.
Here’s
a reference from the Gospel of John. In this passage, Jesus is talking
with some religious leaders who are becoming more and more upset with
Him, and He tells them…
John 8:54-59 (NIV)
Jesus replied, “If
I glorify myself, my glory means nothing. My Father, whom you claim as
your God, is the one who glorifies me. Though you do not know him, I
know him. If I said I did not, I would be a liar like you, but I do
know him and keep his word. Your father Abraham rejoiced at the thought
of seeing my day; he saw it and was glad.”
“You are not yet fifty years old,” the Jews said to him, “and you have
seen Abraham!”
“I
tell you the truth,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I AM!”
At this, they picked up stones to stone him, but Jesus hid himself,
slipping away from the temple grounds.
Do you understand why
they were going to stone Jesus? Were they going to stone Him to death
because He claimed to be really old? No, they were going to stone Him
because they recognized what Jesus was saying when he said, “before
Abraham was born, I AM!” Now, to you and me, it looks like bad grammar.
But to the Jews, it meant something very profound. Because they
remembered what God told Moses way back in the Old Testament. God was
calling Moses to lead the Israelites out of slavery in Egypt, but he
was afraid the people wouldn’t believe God sent him. So Moses asked God
who he should say sent him, and God told him…
Exodus 3:14 (NLT)
God replied, “I AM THE ONE WHO ALWAYS IS. Just tell them, ‘I AM has
sent me to you.’”
So
when Jesus referred to himself as “I AM”, He knew exactly what He was
claiming, and so did the Jews. He was claiming to be God, and the
religious leaders were so offended by that they were going to kill Him
for making that claim. And then a couple chapters later in John…
John 10:24-25, 30-33, 37-38 (NLT)
The
Jewish leaders surrounded him and asked, “How long are you going to
keep us in suspense? If you are the Messiah, tell us plainly.”
Jesus
replied, “I have already told you, and you don’t believe me. The proof
is what I do in the name of my Father…. The Father and I are one.”
Once
again the Jewish leaders picked up stones to kill him. Jesus said, “At
my Father’s direction I have done many things to help the people. For
which one of these good deeds are you killing me?”
They replied, “Not for any good work, but for blasphemy, because you, a
mere man, have made yourself God.”…
“Don’t
believe me unless I carry out my Father’s work. But if I do his work,
believe in what I have done, even if you don’t believe me. Then you
will realize that the Father is in me, and I am in the Father.”
Notice
that when the people accused Jesus of claiming to be God, Jesus didn’t
object. He didn’t tell them they misunderstood. He simply told them,
“Look at the evidence.”
Or how about when Thomas first saw Jesus after the resurrection?
Remember what he said?
In
Matthew 16, Peter identified Jesus as “the Messiah, the Son of the
living God.” And in John 20, Thomas called Jesus, “My Lord and my God.”
And in both cases Jesus commended them on their insight. He didn’t tell
them they were confused, He didn’t correct them, He accepted their
words as being accurate and true. And Peter, Thomas, and the rest of
the disciples, were all killed for their faith, except for John who
they tried to killed, were unsuccessful, so forced him into exile
instead. And over the next 400 years, 2 million other Christ-followers
went to their deaths for believing and proclaiming that Jesus was God
in the flesh.
So, in Scripture and in the words of Jesus Himself
you see the concept of the Trinity taking shape. The Father is God, and
Jesus is God, but the Father is not Jesus and Jesus is not the Father.
But there’s only one God.
Question
3.
A. Jesus was God taking on the appearance
of a human
B.
Jesus was God born as a human
C. Jesus was a mortal man that the Spirit
of God entered at his baptism
D. None of the above
In
the third and fourth centuries, there were a group of people called
Gnostics who rejected a lot of the Bible and started to write their own
Gospels. And one of the strange views that popped up with this is that
only what is spiritual is good. Anything physical, anything material,
is evil. So they reasons that Jesus couldn’t have actually been God,
because God couldn’t have become something physical. I know, pretty
bizarre. Anyway, they came up with this whole theory that there was a
man named Jesus that the Spirit of God entered at his baptism and then
abandoned on the cross. So that’s a pretty strange belief, and it goes
against everything we know about Jesus from Scripture. Like in John
chapter one…
John 1:1-3, 14 (NLT)
In the beginning the Word
already existed. He was with God, and he was God. He was in the
beginning with God. He created everything there is. Nothing exists that
he didn’t make…
So the Word became human and lived here on earth
among us. He was full of unfailing love and faithfulness. And we have
seen his glory, the glory of the only Son of the Father.
It’s an
obvious reference to Jesus, referring to Him as the Word. And it says
the Word has always existed and the Word is God. And He didn’t just
impersonate a human, and He didn’t just possess a human… He became a
human.
And if you want another reference, how about…
Isaiah 7:14 (NLT)
Look! The virgin will conceive a child! She will give birth to a son
and will call him Immanuel (which means ‘God is with us’).
Jesus
was God, but yet He entered into His own Creation, was born as a baby,
and lived among us. And to highlight His human nature, we know that
Jesus experienced fatigue, He got thirsty, He got hungry, He got angry,
He faced temptation, He felt sadness and sorrow… He didn’t just take on
the appearance of a human; He was as human as you and me.
Question
4.
A. God the Father became Jesus and then
became the Holy Spirit
B.
God the Father, Jesus, and the Holy Spirit are three separate persons
C.
Before the incarnation, only God the Father existed. Then the Son
(Jesus) was born, and then the Holy Spirit was sent at Pentecost.
D. Both B and C
We’ve
already looked at what it says in John chapter one, so we already
realize that Jesus was already there in the beginning. He is eternal
and He is God. And if you go back to Genesis chapter one, you can read
about the Spirit of God—perhaps a reference to the Holy Spirit—moving
over the surface of the earth. All three are divine. All three are
eternal. All three existing at the same time. In fact, if you keep
reading in Genesis chapter one, you’ll read (in verse 26) where God
said, “Let us make human beings in our image.” “Let us make human
beings”? Who’s “us”? Many people consider this to be an early reference
to the Trinity.
So “A” and “C” are obviously wrong here. Both of
those suggest that there was a kind of succession. First there was the
Father, then there was Jesus, then there was the Holy Spirit. But no,
all three are eternal. All three are God. But yet all three are
separate.
And this is really where a lot of people get into
trouble trying to explain the Trinity. One common analogy that people
use for the Trinity would go like this: I might look at my own life and
explain that I am a husband, a father, and a son. So even though I am
one individual, I am also three. And I might use that kind of an
analogy to try to explain the Trinity.
But there’s a problem
with this kind of explanation. What is it? Well, it basically teaches
that there’s one person called God, but that He plays three different
roles. He’s after the other. Or He might put on a different mask
depending on the situation.
This is probably the earliest
misunderstanding of the Trinity, and was very quickly condemned by the
early Church. It actually has a name: It’s called modalism, and it says
there’s one God who appears in three different modes or forms.
Modalism
– the false belief that God is a single person who appears in different
modes or forms. (also called Sabellianism)
Kind
of like an actor in one of the ancient Greek plays. The same actor may
hold a mask in front of his face to play one character, put that mask
down and pick up a new one to play a different character, and then do
the same for a third character.
Problem
– Ignores the Scriptural truth that God exists as the Father, Son and
Spirit, as individual persons, all at the same time
Another
popular analogy that falls into this same trap is the idea that God is
like water, which can be solid, liquid or gas. But again, this is a
succession. You might have a block of ice, that ice melts and becomes a
liquid, you heat it up and it evaporates into a steam. They don’t all
exist at the same time.
[I've heard that in some laboratory
experiments with specific conditions at a certain pressure and
temperature, you actually can have ice, water, and vapour all present
at the same time. But if you have to explain that, it’s not a very good
analogy to use.]
Let me show you just one passage to explain why modalism and these
kinds of analogies don’t work…
Matthew 3:16-17 (NLT)
After
his baptism, as Jesus came up out of the water, the heavens were opened
and he saw the Spirit of God descending like a dove and settling on
him. And a voice from heaven said, “This is my dearly loved Son, who
brings me great joy.”
Here you see all three members of the
Trinity all present at the same time. It’s not just one person wearing
different masks; it’s three different persons.
Question
5.
A. The word Trinity is found in the Bible
B. The doctrine of the Trinity is a
contradiction and must be accepted by faith
C.
The Trinity is a mystery that goes beyond our understanding
D. None of the above
Now,
about letter A… You’ll sometimes hear people attack this doctrine of
the Trinity by saying that the word Trinity is not found in the Bible
so it can’t be true. Well, the word “Bible” isn’t in the Bible either.
But I’m pretty sure my Bible exists. The word “pornography” isn’t in
the Bible, either, but the Bible certainly has something to say about
it.
So no, the word Trinity isn’t in the Bible, but that doesn’t
mean that the Bible doesn’t talk about the Trinity. We didn’t come up
with the idea of the Trinity and then try to find it in the Bible; we
found it in the Bible and then came up with the term to explain it.
As
for letter B… people think the Trinity is a contradiction because they
don’t understand what we’re talking about. We’re not saying there are
three Gods and at the same time only one God. Or that would be a
contradiction. And we’re not saying there are three persons but only
one person. That would be a contradiction, too.
We’re saying
there are three persons, but only one God. We’re saying there are three
centers of personhood in one divine nature. And there’s no
contradiction there. It may be difficult to grasp, but then I find
calculus difficult to grasp. Just because it’s difficult to understand
doesn’t mean that it’s wrong or that it’s a contradiction. And
actually, if you chose letter “D”, I’d give you points for that, too,
because while we may not be able to completely define the nature of
God, I think we can understand it at least in part.
Let me tell
you something I learned this week… a second century Christian author by
the name of Tertullian was the first to use the word “Trinitas” (or
Trinity) to describe the nature of God. He’s also the one who came up
with the word “Personae”, or person. Before that time, there was no
real concept of personhood, at least not like we have today. So the
word “person” was created to explain how one God is three persons… a
Trinity.
Now, what makes this doctrine of the Trinity difficult
to grasp is not that it’s irrational or contradictory, because it’s
not. What makes it difficult is that we have no personal point of
reference apart from the Trinity. I am one person. You are one person.
Apart from God, we don’t have any experience with anyone who is three
persons. But then, wouldn’t you expect the all-powerful, all-knowing,
infinite Creator of all that exists to exceed our ability to understand
or explain Him? The Trinity is not a contradiction, but it is a mystery
because it goes beyond our ability to fully comprehend (although we can
at least begin to understand it).
Question
6.
A. God is the total life-force of all
living things
B. God is a person
C. The Trinity teaches that there are
three gods
D.
None of the above
Okay,
this was a bit of a trick question. But maybe you caught it. The answer
is… D, none of the above. We just talked about this: God is not a
person, He is three persons. However, He is not three Gods. That’s
called Polytheism…
Polytheism
– the belief in more than one God
Problem
– Ignores the Scriptural truth that there is one and only one God
That’s
affirmed time and time again throughout the Bible. So that was never in
question… the disciples and the early Christians all believed there was
only one God.
However, they also understood that the Father is
God, that Jesus is God, and that the Holy Spirit is God. All three of
them were God, but there was only one God. But how could that be?
That’s what those early debates and councils strived to answer.
But
understand, it was never in question that there was only one God and
that all three were divine. A lot of the recent attacks on Christianity
try to claim that Jesus wasn’t considered to be divine until the
Council of Nicaea, but He was always considered to be divine. The
struggle was to try to understand and explain that fact.
Question
7.
A. Jesus was the first creation of God
the Father
B. Jesus appeared in the Old Testament as
the archangel Michael
C.
Jesus was fully God and fully man
D. Both A and C
There
are cults today, like Jehovah’s Witnesses who still believe that Jesus
was just a created being. Jehovah’s Witnesses even believe that before
the incarnation, Jesus was the angel Michael. Well, this idea that
Jesus was not really God but just a superior created being popped up
early in the fourth century, promoted by a guy named Arius, and became
known as Arianism. (Not to be confused with the Nazi form of Aryanism
spelt with a “y”.)
Arianism
– The belief that Jesus was not fully divine, but was a superior
created being
Problem
– Ignores the Scriptural claims of divinity of Jesus and nullifies the
sacrifice on the Cross
…
because if Jesus was just part of creation he could not pay for the
sins of the rest of creation. And this is really what was behind the
Council of Nicaea. Was Jesus like God the Father, or was He of the same
substance as God the Father? The Church leaders knew that Arianism was
false, that it was a heresy, but they didn’t know how to address it. So
they needed to get together and nail down what they understood
Scripture to teach about the nature of Jesus.
So let’s take another look at a couple of the passages they would have
examined.
John 1:1-4 (NLT)
In
the beginning the Word already existed. The Word was with God, and the
Word was God. He existed in the beginning with God. God created
everything through him, and nothing was created except through him. The
Word gave life to everything that was created, and his life brought
light to everyone.
So Jesus wasn’t part of Creation; He was the source of Creation.
Colossians 2:9 (NLT)
For in Christ lives all the fullness of God in a human body.
Jesus
was fully God and fully man. They would have examined passages like
this. They would have examined Old Testament prophecies. They would
have studied the words of Jesus Himself. And after about a month of
focusing on this issue alone, this is what they concluded about the
identity of Jesus… this is part of what we know as the Nicene Creed:
We believe in one Lord, Jesus Christ,
the only Son of God, (and
by the way, “Son of God” is not a biological term but a heavenly term.
The Jews understood the term to refer to divinity, not biology.)
eternally begotten of the Father,
God from God, Light from Light,
true God from true God,
begotten, not made,
of one being with the Father.
Through him all things were made.
For us and for our salvation
he came down from heaven:
by the power of the Holy Spirit
he became incarnate from the Virgin Mary,
and was made man.
For our sake he was crucified under Pontius Pilate;
he suffered death and was buried.
On the third day he rose again
in accordance with the Scriptures;
He ascended into heaven
and is seated at the right hand of the Father.
He will come again in glory
to judge the living and the dead,
and his kingdom will have no end.
Actually,
it’s kind of funny: if you look at the full creed, there’s only one
short paragraph about God the Father. And then there’s another short
paragraph about the Holy Spirit. And all of this about Jesus, because
that was the question they were trying to address. All to clarify that
Jesus was fully God and fully man.
Question
8.
A. The Father is the greatest member of
the Trinity
B. The Son is the greatest member of the
Trinity
C. The Holy Spirit is the greatest member
of the Trinity
D.
None of the above
I
can understand how people can think that one member of the Trinity is
more important than another. I mean, we ever refer to them in an order…
The Father is the first member of the Trinity, Jesus is the second
member of the Trinity, and the Holy Spirit is the third member of the
Trinity. So this give the illusion that there’s an order of priority or
supremacy there.
But there’s not. All three are God. All three
are equal. Even though we do see them submitting to each other… Jesus
does the will of the Father, the Father glorifies the Son, the Spirit
points us to Jesus, Jesus is led by the Spirit, the Father tells us to
listen to the Son… There’s a mutual submission that we see within the
Trinity, but that does not indicate that one is superior to the other.
They are co-equal.
The Father is God. Philippians chapter 2
tells us that Jesus is in His very nature God. Acts chapter 5 equates
the Holy Spirit with God. They are all God, and are all equal.
That’s
all the time we have for our "class" today. If you’re following along
in the book, then this week you should read chapter 7 – God Above, God
Beside, God Within. And then in your LIFE Group you will be discussing
more about the Trinity, you’ll also talk about a Christian view of
time, about our cultural commission, and about the rationality of
Christianity.
If you’ve been missing out so far, that’s fine. Just hop into a group
this week.
|